Thursday, March 7, 2013

Environmental Sustainability and Food Services


By Nona Robinson



                More and more people are justifiably concerned about how our food choices can impact the environment, and there are many, many aspects to food production and consumption that have environmental implications. How Trent’s food services evolve can really reflect our university’s commitment to environmental issues … and it’s important to know what the challenges are.

How food is produced

                Where does that burger come from? Tracing back the origins of the different foods we eat, especially processed food, can be a huge challenge.

                How the food is grown and produced in the first place is also environmentally significant. Agricultural practices have huge environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas production (not just CO2, but also methane from cow farts). Manufactured fertilizers are made from petroleum products. Pesticides can have an impact on biodiversity, as can mono-culture, soil erosion, and conversion of ecologically sensitive areas such as rainforests to agricultural production. 

                How high up we’re eating on the food chain makes a huge difference. Producing meat requires either significant amounts of pasture or grain (and sometimes other meat products, unfortunately).  Michael Pollan, who’s the go-to guy for information about food, health and the environment, says to eat real food, not too much, mostly plants.* If you’re eating for sustainability, meat should be a treat, and look for meat that’s produced as part of an ecological farm system (so the manure is gold, not waste).  There’s also been great work done on increasing people’s awareness of sustainable fishing practices.

                The distance traveled to bring food to each of us is an important consideration. Generally speaking, the more ingredients and the more processed the food choice, the more kilometers its components have racked up. Single-ingredient food (e.g. fresh produce) is less travel-intensive than multiple-ingredient foods. Packaging, too, is something to consider. Is organic spinach grown in California on a huge farm, picked and refrigerated, and then shipped in a plastic clamshell container good for the environment? Yes, organic growing practices are so much better for the environment, but those clamshells suck.

                On the other hand, given that we have winter – and hands up who’s tired of the snow? – unlike California we can’t produce fresh produce all year long. Eating seasonally is also a good choice for the environment, although only having beets, potatoes and turnips at this time of year could get tired. It’s worth keeping in mind that storing produce, or using greenhouses to provide fresh leafy greens, also requires energy.

                There is no choice that is perfect, but some are better than others.

Food services management

                Okay, let’s say we’ve got a bunch of ingredients that have a lower environmental impact, now how can the food services operation further contribute to sustainable practices?

n       Sourcing food that’s sustainably produced
n       Prioritizing in-house cooking over pre-prepared or processed food
n       Minimizing food waste in terms of leftovers and spoilage, and composting what does occur
n       Tracking utilities in terms of cooking, refrigeration, heating/cooling and lighting
n       Reduce packaging and also create incentives to stop takeout container use
n       Providing information and education around sustainable food choices.

                So why isn’t everyone doing this? There’s always a balance. Not everyone wants to eat kale and quinoa every day, or wants to prioritize sustainability over being able to choose foods they want to eat. Sustainable food is more labour-intensive to produce and costs more. Similarly, in-house cooking requires more labour. People want convenience, so they want to be able to put their coffee in a takeout cup and their salad in a disposable container; having a reusable container program would again be more labour-intensive. The answer to “why not?” usually comes down to cost and demand.

                It’s one of the ironies of the past 50 years that processed food has gotten cheaper and cheaper, so “real” food is more expensive to provide. One piece of the food review committee’s will be trying to strike the balance between sustainability, demand, and affordability, and we want to hear from you about how to do it.

__________________
* Michael Pollan’s seven rules for healthy eating:
  1. Don't eat anything your great grandmother wouldn't recognize as food.
  2. Don’t eat anything with more than five ingredients, or ingredients you can't pronounce.
  3. Stay out of the middle of the supermarket; shop on the perimeter of the store.
  4. Don't eat anything that won't eventually rot.
  5. It is not just what you eat but how you eat.
  6. Eat meals at the table and enjoy meals with the people you love.
  7. Don't buy food where you buy your gasoline.

No comments:

Post a Comment